Former President Ferdinand Marcos Hero's Burial

The Supreme court of the Philippines has dismissed the case that wants to block the hero's burial for former Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos.

In an unanimous decision 9-5, with one justice abstaining, the Supreme Court rejected arguments that Marcos was unfit to be re-interred in the National Heroes' Cemetery in Manila.

The decision was met with great pleasure by the supporters of the former president who had gathered outside the court, and outrage from some handful protesters opposing it.

Shortly after his election in May, President Rodrigo Duterte announced plans to move the late dictator from his current resting place in a mausoleum in the family's stronghold of Ilocos Norte, in the Philippines' northeast.


Ferdinand Marcos' daughter Imee speaks at a rally in support of the re-internment in October.

Associate Justice Bienvenido Reyes inhibited from the case, reducing to 14 the number of justices who voted.

Voted in favor of giving Marcos a hero's burial:

Associate Justices Arturo Brion, Presbitero Velasco Jr, Diosdado Peralta, Lucas Bersamin, Mariano del Castillo, Jose Perez, Teresita de Castro, Jose Mendoza, and Estela Perlas-Bernabe .

Dissented:

Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, together with Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio, and Associate Justices Marvic Leonen, Francis Jardeleza, and Alfredo Benjamin Caguioa

Reyes has not cited specific reasons for his recusement but it was he who administered the oath of President Rodrigo Duterte last June. He was Duterte's fraternity brother at the San Beda College of Law and a former lawyer of the family of former president Benigno Aquino III.

source:
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/07/asia/philippines-ferdinand-marcos-burial-protest/

SC flooded with petitions vs Cybercrime Law

September 26, 2012 4:00pm

The recently passed Cybercrime Law (RA 101750) has undoubtedly whipped up a storm, with two petitions already filed at the Supreme Court (SC) as of Tuesday, Sept. 25, questioning its constitutionality.

A few more petitions are expected to be filed at the high court, with Sen. Teofisto “TG” Guingona III and Kabataan party-list representative Raymond Palatino having expressed their interest in declaring certain provisions of the law as void.

Human rights lawyer Harry Roque has also made known his office’s desire to question the Cybercrime Law, but only before a regional trial court. Roque’s associate, Atty. Romel Bagares, said they will file a petition for “declaratory relief” since new measure has not caused any injury yet.

In the petitions already filed at the SC, ABS-CBN.com and InterAksyon.com named the petitioners as businessman Louis “Barok” Biraogo and party-list group Alam.

In their 28-page petition for certiorari, prohibition, injunction and preliminary injunction filed on Sept. 24, Biraogo and Alam contend that “Sec. 4(c) [4], Sec. 12, Sec. 20, and the penal provisions of the law” as unconstitutional.

“With the enactment of Republic Act No. 10175, cyber technology, once a boom to petitioner and the general public, is now subjected to subtle but pervasive State monitoring and control,” the petition read, as quoted by ABS-CBN.com.

Section 4 [c] penalizes libel “committed through a computer system or any other similar means which may be devised in the future.”

Section 12, meanwhile, deems illegal “to collect or record by technical or electronic means traffic data in real-time associated with specified communications transmitted by means of a computer system.”

Section 20 lists the penalties for non-compliance with the law.

Biraogo said the passage of the law was “attended with grave abuse of discretion because its questioned provisions contravene Sections 3 (1) (on inviolability of privacy of communication) and 4 (on freedom of speech, of expression, of the press, and peaceful assembly), Art. III (Bill of Rights) of the 1987 Constitution.”

Biraogo is the same businessman who successfully petitioned the SC for the nullification of President Aquino’s creation of the Truth Commission.

Online site BicolToday.com earlier reported that Palatino is set to challenge the law before the SC. The petition, however, will also question Section 19 of the law.

Under that section is a controversial provision that gives the Department of Justice the power to “restrict or block” a website based on prima facie evidence.

“This effectively gives DOJ total control of the Internet in the Philippines. As only prima facie evidence is needed, the new law has done away with due process. Once the DOJ realizes this new power and uses this provision to take down dissident websites – that would be the death of Internet freedom as we know it,” Palatino said, as quoted by BicolToday.com.

Source: gmanetwork news